On
Monday, June 1, 2026, Prime Minister Mark Carney spoke out against antisemitism
at the Holy Blossom Temple in Toronto. The nice-sounding speech was the
Liberals' admission of their poor performance in providing peace, order and
good government.
While
Carney decried antisemitism, he ignored the responsibility of his
administration for the current violence and social hate that is openly
displayed in our communities. He also revealed the ideological backdrop of
Liberal weakness, which has yielded our tragic social situation.
Carney
said, “Canada was not founded on a single creed, race, language, or faith.”
In
some respects, his sentiment is wrong. Canada is founded on the Westminster
model of governance, which is a Constitutional Monarchy. Therefore, Canada is
inherently a Christian country in law. We have a Sovereign from which all
government authority flows. Our Sovereign receives authority to reign from God,
from a Christian Crown in a Christian church, with a Christian liturgy and
prayers of supplication, acceptance, and blessing. It is exclusive in nature,
recognizing that there is only one creator God to whom we are accountable and
from whom we exist. It is that Christian base that gives the ethic of neutrality
of governance and freedom to all faiths.
In
addition, Carney said, “In Canada, state neutrality does not empty the
public square but ensures that no conception of the good — including humanism
or atheism — is privileged by state power, and that every Canadian has the
freedom of conscience to live as they believe.”
His
statement misses context. Historically, there have been criminal code limits on
public expressions of belief. Sections 318 and 319 of the Criminal Code
specifically address hate propaganda and public incitement of hatred. These
provisions prohibit advocating genocide, inciting hatred against an
identifiable group, or promoting violence based on hate. In addition, 264(1)
prohibits harassment causing fear. There are also Human Rights Codes that limit
cultural, political, and religious expression. Canada has sufficient laws to
fulfill its duty to maintain peace and order, but the Liberals have not
delivered them.
Carney
further pursued his inherent denialism by saying, “This means that the
state—above the responsibilities we all have as citizens—has a special
responsibility to ensure that no culture, faith, race, gender, or identity is
threatened or suppressed.”
He
fails to address the main source of Canada’s dilemma directly. There is a
religious political belief held by those who illegally protest in our streets,
calling for violence against Canadians. These perpetrators do not accept
Canadian cultural traditions and they openly defy our social contract. These
disloyal people were encouraged to come to Canada by the Liberals, and then
they have done little to defend our Canadian social core. Canada reaps the
consequences that Carney speaks against, but for which his government has been
responsible.
Carney
admits that, “Last year, over two-thirds of all religion-motivated hate
crimes were directed at Jewish Canadians who make up only 1% of the population.
To that end, I am pleased to announce the launch and membership of Canada’s new
Ministerial Advisory Council on Rights, Equality, and Inclusion to be chaired
by the Minister of Canadian Identity and Culture, Marc Miller. The Council has
a clear mission: to combat racism and hate in all their forms, and to guide the
Government of Canada as we build a fairer, more just, more inclusive country.”
The
problem is that the Council tasked with solving antisemitism includes members
with histories tied to groups and causes that are viewed as hostile to Jews or
supportive of designated terrorist organizations. In addition, he did not mention whether his
own government’s past funding of antisemitism would be investigated.
In
typical Liberal moral relative fashion, Carney said, “Differences generate
friction. Accommodation of competing claims is real work. We will always have
our legitimate debates about where the lines properly fall. But those debates
are part of how our pluralistic country sustains itself.”
It
is incredible to believe that in Canada, according to our Prime Minister, hate
and violence towards Jews is just a feature of a healthy debate in a
pluralistic society.
Carney
does not admit that their Immigration policy and lack of social defence have
emboldened the insurrectionists and hatemongers. Capacity to offend creates its
own demand for more offending.
Carney
repeats an ideal which they have failed to apply to immigration screening. He
is culpable by his own admission. "When you come to Canada, you bring
your faith, your tradition, your language, your story. You leave behind your
wars and your animosities.”
“This means that no Canadian going about their daily life
should be held responsible for the actions of any government, wherever they may
be. Whether they are on the subway, in a store, at a hospital, at a university,
in a synagogue, a mosque, a gurdwara, or a temple.”
Carney
is admitting the tragedy that he is presiding over, without any contrition for
his government's role in creating it.
“This requires holding political debates in Parliament and
in the public sphere, and not targeting private businesses, homes, and
communities. The covenant runs in every direction. Antisemitism breaks it.
Islamophobia breaks it. Burning churches breaks it. Transphobia breaks it. The
targeting of any Canadian for their faith, their origin, or their identity
breaks it.”
Carney
does not admit that there are religious-political beliefs that are publicly acted
out with violence, which defy our laws and cultural core. His repetition of the
myth of Islamophobia for the illusion of balance only emboldens violence.
Carney
concludes, “Each failure has taught us something about what it means to be
the country we aspire to be. That means protection. That means outlawing and
policing hate. That means preventing radicalization and addressing
institutional biases. That means restoring Canada's promise by ensuring each of
us has the space and confidence to be our whole selves and thrive. Canada
promises a country in which Indigenous Peoples, Muslim Canadians, Black
Canadians, Sikh Canadians, Christian Canadians, Queer Canadians — every Canadian
— can be visibly themselves without fear. Canada promises a country where our
differences are nurtured, not managed, where our differences are honoured, not
suppressed. Where our differences are lived out in common, not pushed to the
margins. That is the covenant we are renewing today. And which we must all
honour with our actions.”
Carney’s
speech is an admission of failure, as Canadians know our present state is far
below what is required. The significant antisemitism and community violence,
shootings, arsons, and targeted murders have especially emerged since 2015,
when Liberals came to power. The typical Liberal response is another talk-shop
Council.
Carney’s
speech is without admission of Liberal error and responsibility. His Liberalism
mischaracterizes the inherent legal nature of Canada. He also ignores our
cultural essence. He speaks of ideals. However, of deep concern is the lack of
renewed commitment to defend Canada with hard power and authentic law
enforcement to protect all of what Canada is and means.


1 comment:
Wow...you pull no punches. I read the full speech on-line. You hit the salient points. In my estimation, the great words still did not cover over a sense of superiority and condescension to those outside Carney’s immediate circle. In a way, it was a lecture to the naughty, instead of inspiration to lead somewhere better.
Post a Comment