Want to read some scary stuff? Unbelievably it comes from right here in BC. This kind of rhetoric is an echo, right out of the old failed Soviet Union literature. For example, the NDP’s understanding and meaning of ‘equality’ is quite different from what an average person might understand. Just think about the paragraph below for a moment. The thought that intelligent people vote for this is very sad. How many millions have died or were killed in this world because of these kinds of myths? We must hope that BCers are smarter and more politically aware. BC had this ideology in power twice before, and it ended badly due to these deep seated ideas, and it won't be any different next time, for the socialist religion never really changes.
* * * * * * *
The Constitution of the New Democratic Party of British Columbia
PREAMBLE
The New Democratic Party believes that social, economic and political progress in Canada can only be assured by the application of democratic socialist principles to government and the administration of public affairs.
The principles of democratic socialism can be defined briefly as follows:
a) the production and distribution of goods and services shall be directed to meeting the social and individual needs of people and not for profit,
b) the modification and control of the operations of monopolistic productive and distributive organizations through economic and social planning, towards these ends, and
c) where necessary, the extension of the principle of social ownership.
The New Democratic Party holds firm to the belief that the dignity, freedom and equality of the individual is a basic right that must be maintained and extended.
The New Democratic Party is proud to be associated with the democratic socialist parties of the world and to share in the struggle for peace, international co-operation and the abolition of poverty.
Monday, 30 April, 2012
Sunday, 15 April, 2012
IT IS OVER !
The street poster says, "Christy Clark Heads Fabulist Party Come Clean BC Deserves Full Public Rail Inquiry"
In Provincial politics, the NDP have won nothing on their merits, however the BC Liberals have lost everything. Just like Rita Johnston and her dying Social Credit Party, or Kim Campbell at the end of the Mulroney Progressive-Cons, the lady brought in at the end to save things just cannot do it -too little -too late. It is all over. All the NDP have to do is keep quiet and not reveal their socialism and other nasties, and they will be government next time. The only option to limit the coming damage to the Province, is to elect as many BC Conservatives as possible to protect against the NDP danger-wave rolling fast to shore. As of April, it is still a long-shot for the BC Conservatives to be considered a government-in-waiting. The poster on Main Street Vancouver says a lot, both for its very existence and its inherent message. BC is in for a rough political ride –hang on !
Monday, 12 March, 2012
Senate Elections
BC could be a national leader to show the way for other Provinces in electoral reform. It has now been confirmed, that it will take a BC Conservative government to have BC Senators elected.
* * * * * * *
Liberal commitment to an elected Senate reform is a PR stunt
March, 2012 – Vancouver – “The Clark government’s delay of the private members bill to hold Senate elections is just another example of an inept government’s bungling” said John Cummins leader of British Columbia’s Conservatives.
The Bill would divide British Columbia up into six Senate districts. However, sitting Senators have not been paired with these “Senate seats”. So for example, the process to determine which seat will be filled upon the retirement of Senator St. Germain this fall has not been addressed by the bill.
The proposed legislation calls on Elections BC to investigate ways to permit online voting for Senators, something current law will not permit.
“Also troubling is the sunset clause that would cancel Senate elections if BC does not gain more seats in the Senate after eight years. While an equal Senate is an important goal, the position that if it can’t be equal, it can’t be democratic seems to me like throwing the baby out with the bath water.”
“If the Liberals really believed in senate reform the proposed legislation would have been well considered before presentation to the legislature, with necessary amending legislation attached to allow the intent of the bill to be realized.”
“If this government was serious about electing BC’s Senators, this would be government legislation, not a private member’s bill and it would be passed quickly, not delayed for months.”
“When it comes to Senate reform the Liberal government is just going through the motions,” said Cummins.” I have long supported Senate reform. I voted for it as an MP and campaigned for it during federal elections. A new BC Conservative government would bring in a meaningful Senate Election act as a government bill.”
* * * * * * *
Liberal commitment to an elected Senate reform is a PR stunt
March, 2012 – Vancouver – “The Clark government’s delay of the private members bill to hold Senate elections is just another example of an inept government’s bungling” said John Cummins leader of British Columbia’s Conservatives.
The Bill would divide British Columbia up into six Senate districts. However, sitting Senators have not been paired with these “Senate seats”. So for example, the process to determine which seat will be filled upon the retirement of Senator St. Germain this fall has not been addressed by the bill.
The proposed legislation calls on Elections BC to investigate ways to permit online voting for Senators, something current law will not permit.
“Also troubling is the sunset clause that would cancel Senate elections if BC does not gain more seats in the Senate after eight years. While an equal Senate is an important goal, the position that if it can’t be equal, it can’t be democratic seems to me like throwing the baby out with the bath water.”
“If the Liberals really believed in senate reform the proposed legislation would have been well considered before presentation to the legislature, with necessary amending legislation attached to allow the intent of the bill to be realized.”
“If this government was serious about electing BC’s Senators, this would be government legislation, not a private member’s bill and it would be passed quickly, not delayed for months.”
“When it comes to Senate reform the Liberal government is just going through the motions,” said Cummins.” I have long supported Senate reform. I voted for it as an MP and campaigned for it during federal elections. A new BC Conservative government would bring in a meaningful Senate Election act as a government bill.”
Wednesday, 15 February, 2012
BC Liberals loose election !
No chance for Libs in Royal City
By Paul Forseth, The Royal City Record Newspaper
February 15, 2012
Re: Liberals at point of no return, The Record, Feb. 8.
The Keith Baldrey article of Feb. 8 echoes what I have been saying: that no matter what the B.C. Liberals do, it is over for them. In some ways, poor Christy Clark has become the Kim Campbell of B.C. politics; she is the leader of a lost cause.
In the next election, the B.C. Liberals will likely put on a good flashy campaign and show lots of energy and money spent, but it will not make any difference. Some deep barrier was crossed where many voters, especially more conservative-minded ones, will not give the B.C. Liberals another reluctant pass. There will be no more "hold-your-nose voting" across the province.
To be specific for New Westminster, it is a no-brainer to say that the local B.C. Liberal candidate has absolutely no chance of being elected next time, especially when the B.C. Liberals as a party will lose the next election.
From a local perspective within New Westminster, the contest will be between me as a B.C. Conservative, and the NDP, with any remainder Liberal vote just dividing the non-socialist vote.
My evaluation is based on electoral history. In the 1940s, New Westminster's MLA was Byron "Boss" Johnson, who became premier of a LiberalConservative Coalition government.
When the coalition ended, New Westminster went opposition socialist as the Social Credit government of W.A.C. Bennett won in 1952. In that election for New Westminster, CCF (meaning NDP) Rae Eddie became the MLA from 1952 to 1969. Then Dennis Cocke (NDP) 1969 to 1986, Anita Hagen (NDP) 1986 to 1996, Graeme Bowbrick (NDP) 1996 to 2001, Joyce Murray (Lib) 2001 to 2005, Chuck Puchmayr (NDP) 2005 to 2009, Dawn Black (NDP) 2009 to present. Black is not running again.
A Liberal was only elected here once when the NDP were embarrassed down to two seats provincially. It returned to the old pattern in the next election. This time around, since the unwritten voter coalition of Liberal-Conservative voting is over, it could be a predictable win for the NDP again. However, non-NDPers can take hope in a few things. There has been a gradual demographic change in New Westminster. The hundreds that have given up locally and who do not bother to vote anymore might become roused to vote this time, now that there is a true Conservative choice.
Additionally, some NDP vote might come my way, considering how the NDP leadership rudely cast aside Dawn Black as part of the ousted Carol James group.
In conclusion, analyst Keith Baldrey is correct when he says, "a stench of sorts begins to envelop a government, and it can be very hard to get rid of it."
Paul Forseth, B.C. Conservative Candidate
By Paul Forseth, The Royal City Record Newspaper
February 15, 2012
Re: Liberals at point of no return, The Record, Feb. 8.
The Keith Baldrey article of Feb. 8 echoes what I have been saying: that no matter what the B.C. Liberals do, it is over for them. In some ways, poor Christy Clark has become the Kim Campbell of B.C. politics; she is the leader of a lost cause.
In the next election, the B.C. Liberals will likely put on a good flashy campaign and show lots of energy and money spent, but it will not make any difference. Some deep barrier was crossed where many voters, especially more conservative-minded ones, will not give the B.C. Liberals another reluctant pass. There will be no more "hold-your-nose voting" across the province.
To be specific for New Westminster, it is a no-brainer to say that the local B.C. Liberal candidate has absolutely no chance of being elected next time, especially when the B.C. Liberals as a party will lose the next election.
From a local perspective within New Westminster, the contest will be between me as a B.C. Conservative, and the NDP, with any remainder Liberal vote just dividing the non-socialist vote.
My evaluation is based on electoral history. In the 1940s, New Westminster's MLA was Byron "Boss" Johnson, who became premier of a LiberalConservative Coalition government.
When the coalition ended, New Westminster went opposition socialist as the Social Credit government of W.A.C. Bennett won in 1952. In that election for New Westminster, CCF (meaning NDP) Rae Eddie became the MLA from 1952 to 1969. Then Dennis Cocke (NDP) 1969 to 1986, Anita Hagen (NDP) 1986 to 1996, Graeme Bowbrick (NDP) 1996 to 2001, Joyce Murray (Lib) 2001 to 2005, Chuck Puchmayr (NDP) 2005 to 2009, Dawn Black (NDP) 2009 to present. Black is not running again.
A Liberal was only elected here once when the NDP were embarrassed down to two seats provincially. It returned to the old pattern in the next election. This time around, since the unwritten voter coalition of Liberal-Conservative voting is over, it could be a predictable win for the NDP again. However, non-NDPers can take hope in a few things. There has been a gradual demographic change in New Westminster. The hundreds that have given up locally and who do not bother to vote anymore might become roused to vote this time, now that there is a true Conservative choice.
Additionally, some NDP vote might come my way, considering how the NDP leadership rudely cast aside Dawn Black as part of the ousted Carol James group.
In conclusion, analyst Keith Baldrey is correct when he says, "a stench of sorts begins to envelop a government, and it can be very hard to get rid of it."
Paul Forseth, B.C. Conservative Candidate
New Westminster
Tuesday, 20 December, 2011
What is clear !
What is CLEAR !
The BC Liberals are not going to win the next election (for sure).
The Provincial Conservative-Liberal coalition is over.
The BC Conservatives are here to stay.
The BC Liberals have broken democratic faith with citizens.
History has proven that NDP socialism has no answer for the economic dilemma.
Now is the time to build a conservative movement, to protect our Province, and realistically face future challenges.
Go to “www.bcconservative.ca” and use your credit card to join up.
The BC Conservative Team is ready to serve.
Now there is a credible choice !
Thursday, 1 December, 2011
Join the BC Conservatives
Now there is a credible choice!
The BC Liberals have broken democratic faith with citizens.
History has proven that NDP socialism has no answer for the economic dilemma.
It is time to build a conservative movement, to protect our Province, and realistically face future challenges
Leader John Cummins and the BC Conservative Team is ready to serve
Some Basics
*Clearly defined public programs that are affordable and effective, for which delivery is accountable to all British Columbians.
*Managing government to the highest standards of integrity and transparency.
*Governments at all levels are responsible to serve and respect all individuals and their families, including freedom from unnecessary law, regulation, and excessive government.
*Members of the Legislative Assembly are primarily responsible to represent their Constituents, rather than Party or Leader.
*Restructuring the taxation system to maximize benefits for all citizens.
*Competitive free enterprise system as the basis for prosperity and growth.
*Protection and management of the environment and natural resources to optimize benefits, now and the future.
*Rigorous system of law and order, focusing on the rights of victims and the protection of the public.
*Patient-centered health care, and student-focused education.
*Inter-Provincial “Free Trade” across Canada.
*Equality of opportunity for all British Columbians, with special privileges for none.
Paul Forseth and John Cummins were both elected to the federal House of Commons in 1993. They remained together as part of their political caucus until 2006.
Paul says, “After a full career as a Court Officer in the Justice System, I was elected to protect our community from fiscal mismanagement and inadequate legal responses to crime.”
Paul Forseth was elected four times, and also was a federal candidate in the 2011 election.
“I offer my years of public service and legislative experience to my home town. New Westminster is not doomed to repeat the results of so many previous elections.” “I offer a credible choice, and trust voter turnout will respond.”
Join for CHANGE !
The easiest way to join is to open the web site, and use your credit card.
Show your solidarity with those who are supporting choice and change. Join the group who will work effectively for the community, and responsibly represent our City in the BC Legislature.
Join at >>> www.bcconservative.ca www.paulforseth.ca
e-mail forsethpaul@hotmail.com
* * * * * * *
BC Conservative Riding Association for New Westminster
#702 - 1245 Quayside Drive, New Westminster V3M6J6
Phone: 604-520-0254
There is a choice !
Paul Forseth and the BC Conservatives for New Westminster
Tuesday, 30 August, 2011
BC Conservative Party
Former Conservative MP hopes to run provincially in New Westminster
By Doug Ward, Vancouver Sun August 30, 2011
Former Conservative MP Paul Forseth is seeking the provincial Conservative nomination in New Westminster.
Forseth, who was a MP from B.C. between 1993 to 2006 for the Reform, Canadian Alliance and Conservative parties, said he was urged to not run for the fledgling provincial Tories by B.C. Liberal members who fear vote-splitting on the centre-right will only help the NDP.
Forseth, a 64-year-old retired former probation officer, believes the B.C. Liberal Party under Premier Christy Clark, a long-time federal Liberal, is losing its ability to unite federal Conservative and Liberal supporters against the New Democrats.
"The B.C. Liberal coalition is kind of coming to its shelf-life end," said Forseth, who said he has voted for the B.C. Liberals in the past but has not been a member.
Forseth added that vote-splitting won't be a factor in New Westminster because the B.C. Liberals have no chance at taking the riding, which has traditionally been a strong NDP riding and is currently held by New Democrat Dawn Black who is not seeking re-election.
© Copyright (c) The Vancouver Sun
http://www.vancouversun.com/news/Former+Conservative+hopes+provincially+Westminster/5329749/story.html
By Doug Ward, Vancouver Sun August 30, 2011
Former Conservative MP Paul Forseth is seeking the provincial Conservative nomination in New Westminster.
Forseth, who was a MP from B.C. between 1993 to 2006 for the Reform, Canadian Alliance and Conservative parties, said he was urged to not run for the fledgling provincial Tories by B.C. Liberal members who fear vote-splitting on the centre-right will only help the NDP.
Forseth, a 64-year-old retired former probation officer, believes the B.C. Liberal Party under Premier Christy Clark, a long-time federal Liberal, is losing its ability to unite federal Conservative and Liberal supporters against the New Democrats.
"The B.C. Liberal coalition is kind of coming to its shelf-life end," said Forseth, who said he has voted for the B.C. Liberals in the past but has not been a member.
Forseth added that vote-splitting won't be a factor in New Westminster because the B.C. Liberals have no chance at taking the riding, which has traditionally been a strong NDP riding and is currently held by New Democrat Dawn Black who is not seeking re-election.
© Copyright (c) The Vancouver Sun
http://www.vancouversun.com/news/Former+Conservative+hopes+provincially+Westminster/5329749/story.html
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)

